Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Derrick Odhiambo
260
Articles
0
Like
1
Follower
46.2%
Win Rate
-6.3%
ROI
26
Tips
1.92
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
Elvis Coleman 🙂↔️Follow80%Win Rate +39.2%ROI 28Tips 1.80Avg Odds -
2
Declan ₿Won 8/10Follow80%Win Rate +38.6%ROI 13Tips 1.79Avg Odds -
3
GoalwireHQWon 5/5Follow80%Win Rate +48.1%ROI 10Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
4
arpan paulWon 9/9Follow77.8%Win Rate +38.4%ROI 19Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
5
Axel InsulanderWon 10/13Follow76.9%Win Rate +45.1%ROI 13Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
6
Antons Luckn BFollow73.7%Win Rate +23.7%ROI 19Tips 1.86Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
LIMITLESS™ 🔥🤍In this Latvian Higher League encounter between Jelgava and Riga Football Academy, the latter shows strong signs of dominance. Riga Football Academy has a clear edge in offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate stands at.24%, significantly higher than Jelgava's 15%. The xG efficiency is 1.2 compared to Jelgava's 0.8, indicating a better ability to finish high - quality scoring opportunities. In terms of passing, the key pass success rate of Riga Football Academy is 85%, while Jelgava only manages 70%. The value of their forward passes is 0.8 per pass, double that of Jelgava. This allows them to create more significant threats in the opponent's half. The midfield control rate of Riga Football Academy reaches 65%. They are also quick in transitions, with an average counter - attack time of just 8 seconds. When it comes to physical performance, Riga Football Academy runs 1.4 km in total, with 30 high - intensity sprints, outperforming Jelgava's 20 high - intensity sprints. ThiAH
LAT D1
Jelgava
0-1 FK Rigas Futbola skola
-
Smile KyelsYelgava adopts a 4-2-3-1 formation at home, applying high pressure in the front court. The double defensive midfielders are responsible for solid interceptions in the middle, while the full - backs gradually push forward to widen the flanks. They keep passing the ball horizontally to disrupt the opponents' defensive running rhythm. There are two main scoring methods: high - point players in the front court contesting set - pieces and long - range shots from midfielders running forward. At home, the team shows great tenacity in tackles, and the defenders coordinate well in lateral defensive coverages. However, due to the heavy moisture on the pitch at night, players may have minor mistakes when controlling the ball. One of their drawbacks is that when they attack for a long time, the front - court players' running positions may overlap. Facing a compact defense, it's difficult for them to quickly create shooting opportunities. Also, when the full - backs push forward, there are gaps lefAHLAT D1
Jelgava
0-1 FK Rigas Futbola skola
-
p90xLooking at the current form of the teams, Riga Football Academy and Jelgava are in starkly different competitive states. Riga Football Academy has been in outstanding form this season. They've scored 24 goals while conceding only 7. With an average of 2.4 goals per game, their goal - scoring efficiency is remarkable. Their win rate stands at an impressive 80%, and they have a goal difference of 17, placing them among the league's top teams in both attack and defense. On the contrary, Jelgava has struggled. They've managed to score just 14 goals and conceded 16. Their win rate is a meager 30%, with an average of 1.4 goals per game. Defensively, they have many weaknesses, and their goal difference is -2. This shows a huge contrast between them and the away team. Riga Football Academy's offensive system is highly efficient. Their 24 goals include several high - scoring victories. Their forward line is a constant threat, capable of creating numerous goal - scoring opportunities. In contrasO/ULAT D1
Jelgava
0-1 FK Rigas Futbola skola
LAT D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post