Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Iqbal ahmad>

    Henan Football Club VS Qingdao Manatee

    Chinese Super League
    Analysis More Tips
    Henan Football Club
    Henan Football Club 5
    1 Qingdao Manatee
    Qingdao Manatee
    Further Reading
    • Tamaro
      Tamaro
      The Henan team currently has a largely complete starting lineup. The defensive core, Shunic, and the midfield organizer, Adrian, are in stable form. The forward, Kovic, has returned from suspension, and domestic players like Huang Zichang and Wang Shangyuan can start the game. The team's central axis has full combat power. However, the Henan team has been in a slump, with only 1 win, 4 draws, and 5 losses in the last ten matches. Their league ranking has been continuously dropping. The offensive end lacks a stable scoring point, and the finishing efficiency in front of the goal is low. There are occasional coordination errors in the defensive side's cooperation. At home, the Henan team plays in a balanced and pragmatic style, often using the 4 - 4 - 2 formation. They rely on Wang Shangyuan for midfield interception and support, Zhong Yihao for wing sprints and breakthroughs, and Kovic for forward - back play. As for the upcoming match, considering their current form and lineup, the Hen
      AH
      CHA CSL Henan Football Club 5-1 Qingdao Manatee
    • ONUKE IFEANYI
      ONUKE IFEANYI
      The recent form of Henan Team has shown significant fluctuations. In the last 10 rounds, they've achieved 5 wins, 1 draw, and 4 losses. With a win - rate of 50% and a loss - rate of 40%, it indicates that the team lacks stability in crucial games. On the defensive end, the team has been relatively solid. They've kept two clean sheets in the last three rounds (a 1 - 0 win over Shenzhen New Pengcheng and a 4 - 0 win against Liaoning Tie Ren). However, there are efficiency issues on the offensive end. In the last five rounds, they've only scored 8 goals and failed to score in three games. Notably, Henan Team has lost to mid - lower ranked teams like Yunnan Yukun and Zhejiang Greentown, revealing their lack of ability to break through strong defenses. Moreover, in their last 10 games, 60% of the scores have been odd numbers, which is in sharp contrast to Qingdao Hainiu's 40% even - score ratio. This might suggest that the game rhythm could be more in favor of Henan Team's defensive - count
      AH
      CHA CSL Henan Football Club 5-1 Qingdao Manatee
    • João
      João
      The home team, Henan Team, currently sits in 13th place in the league. This season, they've achieved 6 wins, 3 draws, and 8 losses. Their home record stands at 3 wins, 1 draw, and 4 losses. At home, they've scored 9 goals and conceded 10, averaging 1.12 goals scored and 1.25 goals conceded per home game. The away team is Qingdao Hainiu. They're currently in 14th place. This season, Qingdao Hainiu has 6 wins, 3 draws, and 9 losses. Their away record is 1 win, 1 draw, and 7 losses. On the road, they've scored 12 goals and conceded 20, with an average of 1.33 goals scored and 2.22 goals conceded per away game. Looking at the standings, both teams are under pressure to improve their positions. Henan Team, playing at home, has a relatively better defensive record at home compared to Qingdao Hainiu's away performance. However, Qingdao Hainiu scores slightly more goals per away game. This could be an interesting battle between Henan's home - field advantage and Qingdao Hainiu's offensive abil
      O/U
      CHA CSL Henan Football Club 5-1 Qingdao Manatee
    More Recommend
    • Solna has shown a stronger offensive performance this season. Their average offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, higher than Göteborg FF's 14.1%. Moreover, Solna's xG efficiency reaches 1.82 times per game, compared to Göteborg FF's 1.47. In terms of key pass success rate, Solna's 82% accuracy, combined with a front - field passing value of 0.41 times per pass, exerts continuous pressure on the opponent. The team's midfield control is evident, with an average ball possession rate of over 48% and a counter - attack speed of 2.3 seconds per transition, outpacing Göteborg FF's 3.1 seconds. Regarding running statistics, Solna's players cover an average of 112 km per game, including 192 high - intensity sprints, indicating a significant advantage in physical fitness. I have a professional team and analyze selected matches thoroughly every day. Solna has been building a solid defensive line, averaging 14.3 tackles (compared to the opponent's 11.2), 12.1 interceptions (opponent's 9.8
      O/U
      SWE D1 AIK Solna - GAIS
    • Lillestrøm has shown significantly better offensive efficiency than KFUM Oslo recently. The offensive conversion rate of Lillestrøm is 24%, while that of KFUM Oslo is only 14%, and the xG (expected goals) efficiency stands at 1.9 per game compared to 1.2 per game for the opponent. In terms of key passes, Lillestrøm's success rate is 74%, suppressing KFUM Oslo's 62%. The value of forward passes is 0.44 per pass, leading over the 0.31 per pass of the opponent. Regarding midfield control, the home - team (Lillestrøm) regains the ball 68 times per game on average and initiates 14 counter - attacks per game. The high - intensity running data is also outstanding. The average sprint distance of Lillestrøm is 213 km/h, leading KFUM Oslo's 198 km/h. I have a professional team and can provide in - depth analysis of carefully - selected matches every day. Lillestrøm is currently in a strong position in terms of both offensive and defensive statistics. On the defensive end, they average 14.3
      AH
      NOR D1 Lillestrom - KFUM Oslo
    • My analysis is based on in - depth research of each game. Mold has shown remarkable superiority in various offensive aspects this season. Their average offensive conversion rate stands at 20%, while Brann's is only 12%. In terms of xG efficiency, Mold reaches 1.8, far surpassing Brann's 1.2. When it comes to passing, Mold also outperforms. Their key pass success rate is 34%, compared to Brann's 28%. And the value of their forward - field passes is 0.44, while Brann has only 0.3. In midfield control, Mold holds a 48% rate, leaving Brann behind with 42%. Their transition attack speed is 3.2 times per minute, faster than Brann's 2.4 times. In terms of physical performance, Mold's total team running distance is 114 kilometers, more than Brann's 104 kilometers. They also have 180 high - intensity sprints, compared to Brann's 140. Overall, Mold's comprehensive strength in offense, passing, midfield control, and physical exertion gives them an edge in the game. Mold has a strong defensive rec
      O/U
      NOR D1 Molde - Brann
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.