Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Adin Reports>

    KuPs VS FC Vardar Skopje

    UEFA Champions League
    Analysis More Tips
    KuPs
    KuPs
    FC Vardar Skopje
    FC Vardar Skopje
    Further Reading
    • Jack Pellegrini
      Jack Pellegrini
      Gusps has long been at the top of the domestic league, maintaining a consistent competitive state over the years. In the recent six rounds of matches, they've remained undefeated. Their defense has been particularly outstanding, with excellent control over the number of goals conceded per game. The team is well - adapted to the rhythm of night - time cup games at home. They have matured in terms of pressure - resistance and game - control abilities. In terms of tactics, Gusps usually plays with a four - defender balanced formation. They avoid aggressive high - pressing and instead focus on stable midfield passing and ball - control. They rely on the wingers' steady runs to create space and then combine with a central penetration to gradually break through the opponent's defense. They are good at wearing down the opponent's physical strength and then finding fatal flaws. Their positional play tactics have a very high margin of error. Among the players, forward Lehtonen has a sharp sense
      O/U
      UEFA CL KuPs - FC Vardar Skopje
    • RmAtrebi
      RmAtrebi
      The offensive and defensive data of KuPS and Vardar present a sharp contrast. KuPS has an overall record of 70 wins, 30 draws, and 0 losses, averaging 2.0 goals per game. However, their home - field performance is slightly inferior to the overall level. At home, they have 60 wins, 40 draws, and 0 losses. In 10 home games, they scored 10 goals and conceded 5, with an average of 1.0 goals conceded per game, indicating potential issues in their defense. Their average of 6.6 corner kicks per home game shows strong ball - control and organizational skills, but the lack of defensive stability is a concern. On the other hand, Vardar has an overall record of 80 wins, 10 draws, and 10 losses, averaging 2.7 goals per game. Their away performance is even more remarkable with 80 wins, 20 draws, and 0 losses. In 5 away games, they scored 14 goals and conceded only 3, averaging 2.8 goals scored and 0.6 goals conceded per game, which means their defense is almost flawless. An average of 2.4 yellow ca
      AH
      UEFA CL KuPs - FC Vardar Skopje
    • Oscar El Monix〽️🐐
      Oscar El Monix〽️🐐
      The recent forms of the two teams present a stark contrast. KuPS has been in a stable form in the Finnish Premier League and cup competitions. They've achieved an impressive record of 7 wins, 3 draws, and 0 losses in their last 10 matches, with a win - rate as high as 70%. Their home - ground performance is particularly outstanding. They showed great offensive tenacity when they came from behind to beat Elvis 4 - 3. In another match, a 1 - 1 draw against VPS Vaasa demonstrated their solid defensive capabilities. In the first leg of the Champions League, KuPS thrashed Haka 2 - 0 at home. This victory has given them a psychological edge as they head into the upcoming game. Hvardar has been in great form in the North Macedonian First League, winning 8, drawing 1 and losing 1 in their last 10 matches, a win - rate of 80%. Their attacking power is impressive, with two 7 - 0 victories over Tikvesh and Shkupi. However, their defense is rather conservative. There hasn't been a big - ball game
      O/U
      UEFA CL KuPs - FC Vardar Skopje
    More Recommend
    • Iberia 1999 is in excellent form recently, showing clear superiority in multiple aspects compared to Tallinn Flora. In terms of offensive efficiency, Iberia 1999 leads significantly. Its offensive conversion rate is 24%, while Tallinn Flora's is only 14%. The xG efficiency stands at 1.2 versus 0.8, indicating that Iberia 1999 can convert opportunities more effectively. Passing analysis reveals that Iberia 1999's key passing success rate is 84%, much higher than Tallinn Flora's 70%. High - value passes in the front court create more threats. In midfield control, Iberia 1999 has a 60% ball - possession rate. The average transition speed is 8 seconds, enabling it to quickly put pressure on the opponent. The running data is also remarkable. The whole team of Iberia 1999 runs 114 km, with 24 km of high - intensity sprints. This far exceeds Tallinn Flora's 104 km and 20 km, demonstrating its physical advantage and high - pressure defensive ability. Overall, Iberia 1999's comprehensive perfor
      AH
      UEFA CL FC Iberia 1999 Tbilisi - FC Flora Tallinn
    • Is Calders has been in great form recently. In terms of offensive conversion, the team's average offensive conversion rate per game stands at 24%, while Lincoln Red Imps' is only 14%. The xG efficiency of Is Calders reaches 2.4, compared to 1.8 of their opponents. When it comes to key passes, Is Calders has a success rate of 84%, outperforming Lincoln Red Imps' 74%. The value of their forward passes is 0.82, higher than 0.64 of Lincoln Red Imps, which shows their stronger penetration ability. In midfield control, Is Calders enjoys an average ball - possession rate of 60% per game. They can quickly transition the ball within 12 seconds. Their players cover a high - intensity running distance of 110 kilometers per game, more than Lincoln Red Imps' 102 kilometers. They also make 20 sprints per game, far more than 14 sprints of their opponents, thus exerting a strong pressure on the field. Is Caldes has been in good form on the defensive end. They average 18 tackles (12 successful) and 12
      O/U
      UEFA CL Inter Club Escaldes - Lincoln Red Imps FC
    • In previous encounters, Riga FC has shown a clear edge over Ararat Armenia. In terms of offensive efficiency, Riga FC's average conversion rate of offensive finishes stands at 14.2%, significantly higher than Ararat's 9.8%. When it comes to key passes, Riga FC's success rate is 71%, compared to Ararat's 63%. The value index of forward passes of Riga FC is 3.87, far ahead of Ararat's 2.91. In midfield control, Riga FC enjoys a 48% average possession rate per game. Their short - pass success rate reaches 89%, and the frequency of fast - break transitions is 4.2 times per 90 minutes, much higher than Ararat's 2.7 times. In terms of physical performance, Riga FC covers a running distance of 112.4 kilometers per game and has 187 high - intensity sprints, both better than Ararat's 104.1 kilometers and 143 sprints. This indicates that Riga FC has better physical fitness and a more intense pressing rhythm. Riga FC has a clear edge in both defense and offense when compared to Alashkert Armenia.
      O/U
      UEFA CL Riga FC - FC Ararat Armenia
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.