Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Adin Reports>

    Arsenal Tula VS Tekstilshchik Ivanovo

    Russian National Football League
    Analysis More Tips
    Arsenal Tula
    Arsenal Tula
    Tekstilshchik Ivanovo
    Tekstilshchik Ivanovo
    Further Reading
    • richardᶜʳᶠ
      richardᶜʳᶠ
      The home form of Arsenal Tula has been underwhelming this season. Their win rate at home is a mere 0%, with draws accounting for 60% and losses making up 40%. In attack, they manage to score only 1.0 goal per home game on average. With a total of 5 goals scored and 9 conceded, their goal difference stands at -4, indicating significant defensive flaws. The average of 1.2 yellow cards per game points to issues with discipline. Moreover, the average of 2.8 corner kicks per game is below the league average, showing that their offensive methods are limited and inefficient. On the other hand, Ivanovo has a more stable away form. Their away win rate is as high as 66.6%, with no draws and a loss rate of 33.3%. During away games, they score 1.33 goals per game on average, with 8 goals scored and 8 conceded, resulting in a goal difference of 0, which reflects a well - balanced attack and defense. The average of 3.2 corner kicks per game is better than Arsenal Tula's 2.8, suggesting that their wi
      AH
      RUS D1 Arsenal Tula - Tekstilshchik Ivanovo
    • Gem John
      Gem John Won 6/7
      The team has shown some positive signs recently. They secured a 3-0 victory in the last encounter between the two sides, achieving consecutive wins in two rounds and keeping clean sheets in both victories. Looking at their overall performance in the past 10 matches, they've managed 4 wins, 1 draw, and 5 losses, which isn't outstanding. However, after ending a losing streak in the previous round, their form seems to be improving slightly. Currently, they are ranked sixth in the league table this season, having accumulated 20 points. In 13 league games so far, they've won 6, drawn 2, and lost 5, a fairly average performance overall. Defensively and in terms of counter - attacks, they haven't been at their best this season. They've scored 24 goals but conceded 22. When it comes to away games, they've only managed 2 wins, 1 draw, and 7 losses in their last 10 matches. The home team, Arsenal Tula, has a mediocre record in recent matches, winning 4, drawing 2, and losing 4 in the last 10 gam
      O/U
      RUS D1 Arsenal Tula - Tekstilshchik Ivanovo
    • Tamaro
      Tamaro
      Tula Arsenal, a team in the upper - middle echelon of the league, has the potential to strive for a higher ranking. Their recent form has been stable, with a well - balanced offense and defense system that has no obvious weaknesses. They are well - adapted to the rhythm of night games, and their fighting spirit and offensive aggression at home are particularly remarkable. The team employs an aggressive 4 - 3 - 3 formation and mainly uses a high - pressing tactic in the front field. They force the opponents to make mistakes when passing the ball from the backcourt through full - team pressing in the front, and then quickly convert these situations into offensive opportunities. The double - wing attacks in sync, combined with the midfielders' encirclement, create a rich sense of hierarchy in the attack. Among the players, the forward Voronin has a sharp sense of goal - scoring in the penalty area and is good at seizing scoring opportunities in chaotic situations. The midfield core Sokolo
      AH
      RUS D1 Arsenal Tula - Tekstilshchik Ivanovo
    More Recommend
    • Ural has shown a stronger offensive performance this season. Their average offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, which is higher than Moscow Fish - Ray's 14.7%. In terms of xG efficiency, Ural records 1.83 times per game, while Moscow Fish - Ray only manages 1.61 times. When it comes to key passing success rates, Ural has an 82% success rate, outperforming Moscow Fish - Ray's 74%. The value of forward passes also reflects Ural's more accurate offensive organization, with 0.41 compared to 0.33 of their opponents. In midfield control, Ural holds a 62% ball - possession rate and conducts 14.3 counter - attacks per game. This is significantly faster than Moscow Fish - Ray's 11.9 times. Looking at the running data, Ural's players run an average of 118 km per game and have 2.4 high - intensity sprints, indicating an obvious physical advantage. Overall, based on these aspects, Ural seems to have a better chance in this match. Moscow Fish. Ray's defensive performance is lackluster, averag
      O/U
      RUS D1 Ural Sverdlovsk Oblast - Torpedo Moscow
    • Jägers Röda BK has been in excellent form recently. In their last four matches, their offensive conversion rate reached 18.3%, significantly higher than Hälmstad's 11.7%. Their xG efficiency is 0.21 higher per 90 minutes. In terms of offensive organization, Jägers Röda BK also shows clear advantages. Their key pass success rate is 76.4%, compared to Hälmstad's 68.1%. The front - field passing value index is 3.82, while Hälmstad's is only 2.91. In midfield control, Jägers Röda BK holds a 62.1% control rate. Their counter - attack conversion speed is 12.4 seconds, much faster than Hälmstad's 14.7 seconds. In terms of physical performance, Jägers Röda BK's running distance is 112.3 kilometers, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 147, both leading Hälmstad by more than 10%. All these factors suggest that Jägers Röda BK has a strong edge in this game. Jongopojken shows a more solid performance on the defensive end. They average 8.9 tackles, 6.3 interceptions, and 11
      AH
      SWE D1 Djurgardens - Halmstads
    • In recent head - to - head matches, Berekoy has shown a clear edge over Keflavik. In terms of offensive conversion, Berekoy's offensive end conversion rate in the last 4 encounters is 23%, significantly higher than Keflavik's 14%. Berekoy also has an xG efficiency of 1.8 per game, outperforming Keflavik's 1.2 per game. When it comes to offensive organization, Berekoy's key pass success rate is 82%, and its forward - field passing value is 0.44, both better than Keflavik's 76% and 0.31 respectively. This indicates that Berekoy has a stronger ability to organize attacks. In midfield control, Berekoy runs an average of 112 km per game and has 19 high - intensity sprints, while Keflavik only runs 104 km and has 14 high - intensity sprints. On the defensive side, Berekoy has an average of 14 tackles and 11 interceptions per game, more pressing than Keflavik's 10 tackles and 8 interceptions. Overall, Berekoy seems to be in a more favorable position in this match. Breiðablik shows a strong e
      AH
      ICE PR Breidablik - Keflavik
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.