Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Okiem Madridisty
565
Articles
0
Like
1
Follower
48.5%
Win Rate
-8.6%
ROI
70
Tips
1.89
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
Sedinho ⚽️Follow84.6%Win Rate +49.3%ROI 14Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
2
ApoorvWon 14/15Follow84.2%Win Rate +47.5%ROI 19Tips 1.86Avg Odds -
3
GideonJIlposFollow82.4%Win Rate +46.8%ROI 19Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
4
arpan paulFollow81.8%Win Rate +37.9%ROI 11Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
5
Analysis VIP99Won 5/5Follow80%Win Rate +30.1%ROI 10Tips 1.78Avg Odds -
6
saidramadhanFollow77.8%Win Rate +35.7%ROI 29Tips 1.90Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
ICEKHIDBrann has been in a three - game losing streak this season. Currently ranked 11th in the Norwegian Premier League, although they are safe from relegation, seven players, including key positions like goalkeepers and wingers, are out due to injuries. This has severely damaged the team's wing - attack system and counter - attack efficiency, and they need to overcome the psychological impact caused by the incomplete lineup. On the other hand, Strømsgodset is in a relegation battle, sitting at the bottom of the league with only 7 points. They have only won one game in the last ten rounds, and their morale is extremely low. The suspension of their main central defender, Uguni, due to a red card has also created many defensive problems. In past encounters, Brann holds an advantage. However, both teams are not in their best form. Brann's tactical diversity and depth may be the key to victory. Their rich offensive plays can effectively suppress Strømsgodset's limited tactical options. As a reAH
NOR D1
Brann
-
Start Kristiansand
-
Olayori.Stada's tactical system has numerous flaws. There is a significant disconnect between offense and defense, and the tactical execution is extremely poor. The overall playing style lacks stability. The team usually adopts a 4 - 4 - 2 formation, aiming to rely on a defensive - counterattack strategy to gain a foothold on the pitch. However, the implementation of this tactic has been highly ineffective. In the attacking phase, the team's approach is monotonous and rigid. They overly rely on individual breakthroughs of the front - court players. The team's passing and cutting cooperation is unskilled, and the midfield's ability to organize is seriously lacking. As a result, they can't effectively connect the front - and back - court attacks. The offensive rhythm is chaotic, and they have almost no ability to break through in positional play. They can only look for goal - scoring opportunities through sporadic counter - attacks. Once they are continuously suppressed by the opponents in ballO/UNOR D1
Brann
-
Start Kristiansand
-
FRANKLIN CHIGBBrann plays an exquisite and dynamic ground passing and cutting offensive style. The players in the team have excellent individual ball - control skills, and the multi - player cooperation in small areas is highly coordinated. The overall offensive operation is smooth and natural. The team can deliver an average of 3.8 key passes per game. They are good at making continuous short passes through the midfield to gradually push forward, steadily stretching the opponent's defense to create gaps. The off - ball running routes in the front court are diverse, and the overall offensive creativity is quite impressive. On the field, the team has a relatively low error rate. However, its core weakness is the lack of physical confrontation. When facing high - intensity close - range pressing from the opponent, the ball - control stability drops significantly, and the continuity of the front - court offensive rhythm will be affected. Sta's core competitive style lies in its tough and aggressive midAHNOR D1
Brann
-
Start Kristiansand
NOR D1
More Recommend
-
In this Swedish Super League encounter, a detailed analysis of the two teams reveals interesting insights. Let's start with the offensive conversion rates. Göteborg has a season - average offensive conversion rate of 18.3%, ranking third in the league, which is higher than Elfsborg's 14.7%. In terms of xG efficiency, Göteborg also outperforms Elfsborg. Göteborg's xG efficiency stands at 1.21, with an expected 1.04 goals per game, while Elfsborg's is 0.92, with an expected 0.83 goals per game. When it comes to passing statistics, Göteborg has a key - pass success rate of 76.4%, compared to Elfsborg's 72.1%. However, the Passing Territory Value (PTV) shows that the away team, Elfsborg, is more penetrative, with a PTV of 0.48 against Göteborg's 0.41. In midfield control, Elfsborg has an edge. They regain possession an average of 48.3 times per game, more than Göteborg's 42.1. But when it comes to the average time taken to transition into an attack, the two teams are quite comparableO/U
SWE D1
GAIS
-
Elfsborg
SWE D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post