Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
343Follow90%Win Rate +53.2%ROI 10Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
2
Sedinho ⚽️Follow83.3%Win Rate +49.7%ROI 13Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
3
ApoorvWon 8/8Follow83.3%Win Rate +46.5%ROI 12Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
4
arpan paulFollow81.8%Win Rate +37.9%ROI 11Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
5
GideonJIlposFollow81.3%Win Rate +47%ROI 18Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
6
saidramadhanFollow77.8%Win Rate +35.7%ROI 29Tips 1.90Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Mr. FutureGomel has been struggling with a low offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate in finishing attacks is merely 10%, and the xG efficiency stands at 0.8. On the other hand, Liepaja has shown better offensive performance. Their conversion rate reaches 14%, and the xG is 1.2. In terms of passing, Liepaja also has an edge. The success rate of their key passes is 74%, higher than Gomel's 64%, and they've made significant contributions to the passing value in the front - field. When it comes to midfield control, Liepaja holds a 44% ball - possession rate, which allows them to dominate the game rhythm. They have a faster transition speed and can effectively suppress their opponents with quick counter - attacks. Looking at the running statistics, Liepaja's whole team runs up to 110 km and has 40 high - intensity sprints, indicating a physical advantage that can support a full - game pressing. Overall, Liepaja seems to have more advantages in various aspects of the game, and it's likely that tO/U
BLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
-
RMFranceGomel has been struggling with a low offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate in finishing attacks stands at only 10%, and the xG efficiency is 0.8. On the other hand, Liepaja is in a better situation. They have a conversion rate of 14% and an xG of 1.2. In terms of passing, Liepaja has a 74% success rate in key passes, outperforming Gomel's 64%. Their front - court passes contribute significantly to the game. In midfield control, Liepaja holds a 44% ball - possession rate, allowing them to dominate the rhythm. They have a faster transition speed and can effectively suppress their opponents with quick counter - attacks. Regarding running data, Liepaja's whole team runs a total of 110 km and makes 40 high - intensity sprints. Their physical strength advantage enables them to apply full - court pressure. Gomel plays at home with a 4-3-3 high-pressing formation. Relying on the home atmosphere, they keep applying forward pressure. The double defensive midfielders solidly intercept in thO/UBLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
-
rewat.32@OfficiaIn this Belarusian Premier League encounter, the offensive efficiency presents a clear contrast between the two teams. Gomel has been struggling with a low offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate at the end of attacks stands at a mere 10%, and their xG efficiency is 0.8. On the other hand, Liepaja is in a better position, with a conversion rate of 14% and an xG of 1.2. In terms of passing, Liepaja also outperforms Gomel. Their key - pass success rate is 74%, while Gomel's is only 64%. Liepaja's forward - field passes contribute significantly to the game. When it comes to midfield control, Liepaja takes the lead with a 44% ball - possession rate, allowing them to dominate the rhythm. They have a faster transition speed and can effectively suppress the opponent with quick counter - attacks. Looking at the running data, the whole Liepaja team runs 110 km and makes 40 high - intensity sprints. This physical advantage enables them to apply full - court pressure. Given these factors, LieO/UBLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
BLR D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post