Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
The Touchline | 𝐓Follow81.8%Win Rate +43.5%ROI 11Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
1
ApoorvWon 7/7Follow81.8%Win Rate +42.1%ROI 11Tips 1.84Avg Odds -
3
arpan paulFollow78.6%Win Rate +29.9%ROI 14Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
4
CeestixxFollow77.8%Win Rate +39.5%ROI 10Tips 1.84Avg Odds -
5
Fernando GiordanoFollow76.9%Win Rate +35.8%ROI 15Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
6
Reece MccallumWon 7/8Follow76%Win Rate +31.3%ROI 25Tips 1.86Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
TopG VikashThe head - to - head data between Chongqing Tonglianglong and Chengdu Rongcheng reveals distinct differences in tactical execution. In the Super League encounter, Chongqing Tonglianglong held Chengdu Rongcheng to a 3 - 3 draw at home. They managed to equalize after trailing 0 - 2 in the first half. However, they had eight fewer corner kicks, indicating inefficiency in converting attacks and vulnerability in defensive organization. In the Chinese Football Association Cup clash, the two teams played to a 0 - 0 draw, and Chongqing Tonglianglong again had five fewer corner kicks. Chengdu Rongcheng's consistent advantage in set - piece control was a crucial detail. The cumulative difference of 13 corner kicks in the two meetings clearly shows Chengdu Rongcheng's tactical superiority in controlling the game rhythm. The data also shows that Chongqing Tonglianglong has a potent attack, as they scored goals in both meetings. But their defense has significant problems. Falling behind by two goalAH
CHA CSL
Chengdu Rongcheng FC
1-1
Chongqing Tonglianglong
-
TCCurrently, Chengdu Rongcheng sits firmly at the top of the Chinese Super League table with 41 points, while Chongqing Tongliang Long ranks second with 27 points. However, Rongcheng's recent form isn't as stable as the outside world thinks. In the previous round, when they played against relegation - threatened Qingdao Hainiu away, they dominated the ball with 64% possession throughout the game. They attacked for 90 minutes, taking 22 shots but only 3 on target. They only saw a glimmer of victory when Romulo scored in injury - time. However, VAR intervened and ruled a handball by Baihelamu, resulting in a 1 - 1 draw. This old problem of "surrounding the opponent but failing to score" has occurred more than once this season. When facing teams that set up a defensive block, Rongcheng has few ways to break the deadlock. Rongcheng is accustomed to playing a 4 - 2 - 3 - 1 high - pressing formation, with the whole team pushing forward aggressively. The center - backs Han Pengfei and Sorokin aAHCHA CSL
Chengdu Rongcheng FC
1-1
Chongqing Tonglianglong
-
Pi314In recent matches, the offensive performance of Chengdu Rongcheng has been more efficient than that of Chongqing Tongliang Long. In terms of offensive conversion, Chengdu Rongcheng's offensive end has a conversion rate of 18.7% in the last five games, significantly higher than Chongqing Tongliang Long's 11.2%. The xG efficiency value stands at 1.32 for Chengdu Rongcheng compared to 0.89 for their opponents, indicating that Chengdu Rongcheng creates more high - quality goal - scoring opportunities. When it comes to passing, the key passing success rate of Chengdu Rongcheng is 74.3%, while Chongqing Tongliang Long only has 62.1%. The passing value index in the front - court is 31% higher for Chengdu Rongcheng. This means they can maintain a more fluid ball - control rhythm. In midfield, the ball - conduction speed of Chengdu Rongcheng is 5.2 times per minute, faster than Chongqing Tongliang Long's 4.1 times per minute, posing a greater threat in counter - attacks. In terms of physical peAHCHA CSL
Chengdu Rongcheng FC
1-1
Chongqing Tonglianglong
CHA CSL
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post