Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Pi314>

    Fredrikstad VS Lillestrom

    Norway Eliteserien
    Analysis More Tips
    Fredrikstad
    Fredrikstad 0
    2 Lillestrom
    Lillestrom
    Further Reading
    • Darren (Hispanospherical)
      Darren (Hispanospherical)
      Frederikstad's tactical logic is quite clear. The team mainly adopts a high - pressure attacking style on the flanks. At home, they have an average ball possession rate of nearly 55%. In the midfield, Rokshen takes charge of the center, handling both the team's offensive organization and defensive interceptions. He is the key figure in the team's transition between attack and defense. The wing - backs, especially Eide, make significant forward runs. He is not only a threat on the flanks but also the team's top scorer. When combined with the wingers, they create opportunities through crosses from the flanks, chaotic battles in the penalty area, and set - pieces. The center - forward, Lagzaoui, is responsible for scoring goals by heading or shooting in the box. Since the top scorer Nunes is out injured, the team's ability to break through the opponent's defense in positional play has declined. As a result, they rely more on overall passing and second - chance attacks. They will increase
      AH
      NOR D1 Fredrikstad 0-2 Lillestrom
    • sterling pgup
      sterling pgup
      Frederikstad is currently ranked 10th in the league this season. After 11 rounds, they've amassed 14 points, with a win rate of 36.4%. When playing at home, the team has a solid record in 5 home games, achieving 3 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss, accumulating 10 points. Their home win rate is as high as 60%, and they've shown a certain level of stability at both ends of the pitch. On average, they score 1.8 goals and concede 1.2 goals per home game, with their defensive efficiency significantly better than away games. However, in the last six rounds, the team's form has been inconsistent. They've only managed 2 wins, 1 draw, and 3 losses, scoring 8 goals and conceding 10. Their offensive and defensive efficiency has clearly declined, and the number of goals conceded is 4.5 times that of home games. On the other hand, Lillestrøm is sitting pretty in 4th place in the league. After 11 rounds, they've got 19 points, with a win rate of 54.5%. They've demonstrated strong competitiveness at both en
      AH
      NOR D1 Fredrikstad 0-2 Lillestrom
    • freekbass
      freekbass
      Frederikstad's league relegation battle this season remains precarious. Currently, they are 3 points clear of the relegation playoff zone. Although they've temporarily escaped the danger, the league competition is intense. They need to actively fight for points to consolidate their position and climb up the standings. So, their desire to win this game is extremely high. In pre - game preparations, Frederikstad's performance has been mediocre. They had 2 draws and 1 loss in the three friendlies before the league restart. On the other hand, Lillestrøm is currently fourth in the league. There is still a point gap between them and the top three teams that secure European competition spots. To strive for a higher ranking and European qualification, their motivation to win this game is also at its peak. However, Lillestrøm has been in a slump recently. They only managed 1 win and 2 losses in the three pre - game friendlies. Their warm - up preparations were not effective, and they failed t
      O/U
      NOR D1 Fredrikstad 0-2 Lillestrom
    More Recommend
    • The recent offensive performance of Gnistan has been far from satisfactory. In the past five games, their offensive conversion rate was only 6.2%, and the expected goals efficiency was as low as 0.18, indicating a serious lack of efficiency in the attacking third. On the other hand, Mariehamn has shown remarkable form. Their average successful key - pass rate stands at an impressive 83.7%. With a front - field passing value of 12.4 and a stable possession rate of over 58%, their midfield passing is very smooth. In terms of physical performance, Mariehamn has a clear edge. They cover an average running distance of 112.3 kilometers per game and have 47 high - intensity sprints, far exceeding Gnistan's 98.1 kilometers and 32 sprints. This shows their superiority in physical strength and defensive pressure. Gnistan's defense is also vulnerable. Their back - field clearance success rate is only 61%, and the number of tackles per game is less than 5. Their defense can easily be penetrated un
      AH
      FIN D1 Gnistan Helsinki - IFK Mariehamn
    • Tromsø has been struggling with a low offensive efficiency recently. In their last five matches, their attack conversion rate was only 7.2%, and the expected goals (xG) per game averaged at 0.89, which is far lower than the actual number of goals they scored. On the other hand, Valerenga has been performing well in attack. With an attack conversion rate of 14.6% and an average xG of 1.32 per game, they rank among the top three in the Norwegian Premier League. In terms of key pass success rate, Valerenga achieved 78.4%, and the value of front - field passes per 90 minutes reached 12.7, significantly better than Tromsø's 69.1% and 8.9. In midfield control, Valerenga's passing success rate was 89.3%, and their offensive transition speed was 5.2 meters per second, faster than Tromsø's 4.6 meters per second. In terms of running distance and high - intensity sprints, Valerenga averaged 118.7 kilometers per game and 142 sprints, leading over Tromsø's 112.3 kilometers and 121 sprints. If y
      AH
      NOR D1 Tromso IL - Valerenga
    • In this Chile Cup encounter, Magallanes shows significant advantages based on the latest match data. In terms of offensive efficiency, Magallanes has a clear edge. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.4%, far exceeding Audas' 9.2%. The expected goals efficiency (xG/attacking end) of Magallanes reaches 0.15, higher than Audas' 0.08. Regarding the success rate of key passes, Magallanes achieves 72.3%, while Audas only manages 61.7%. The passes per defensive action (PPDA) of the home - team Magallanes is 9.8 times, compared to 13.3 times of the away - team Audas, indicating that Magallanes' front - court pressure is more effective. In midfield control, Magallanes has a ball - possession rate of 58.4%. The average time from defense to attack is 3.2 seconds, faster than Audas' 4.1 seconds. The number of high - intensity sprints of Magallanes is 112 times, while Audas has only 89 times. The average running distance per player of Magallanes is 11.3 km, compared to Audas' 10.7 km, show
      AH
      Chile Cup CD Magallanes - Audax Italiano
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.