Waterford United vs St. Patricks Athletic Tips and Predictions AH Pi314

Ireland Premier Division

Analysis More Tips

Waterford United

St. Patricks Athletic

Further Reading

Philosopher Tips Won 7/9

Team analysis Waterford sit 9th, fighting relegation but in decent home form with 3 wins in last 4. Key: Pádraig Amond, 7 league goals. St Pat's are top-3 contenders, structured under Kenny, but winless in last 5 away. Ryan Edmondson leads attack.

O/U
IRE PR Waterford United 1-1 St. Patricks Athletic
Hamed

St Patrick's Athletic, a traditional powerhouse in the league, is currently ranked third with 41 points after 23 rounds. They are in the play - off zone for the UEFA Europa Conference League, and their overall strength and stability place them in the top tier of the league. In their last game, they thrashed Galway United 3 - 0 at home. They've won 4 out of their last 5 league games, showing a steady form and maintaining a high - level performance in both offense and defense. On the other hand, Waterford United is struggling at the bottom of the league. After 23 rounds, they have 20 points and are ranked 9th (second from the bottom). They have a better goal - difference than Sligo Rovers, who are also on the same points. They are deeply in the relegation battle and are widely regarded as underdogs in the eyes of fans and the general market. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming In the previous two encounters this season, St. Patrick's inflict

AH
IRE PR Waterford United 1-1 St. Patricks Athletic
Henry Land Won 3/5

Watford United finds itself in the 9th position in the league, facing significant relegation pressure. This has spurred the team to go all - out for points, with their fighting spirit at its peak. Recently, the team's form has improved significantly. They've won 3 out of their last 4 matches, achieving convincing victories over Derry City and Drogheda United, and keeping a clean sheet against Sligo Rovers. Their offensive firepower has been fully unleashed, and the scoring efficiency of their front line has notably improved. At home, Watford United has a good record, with 2 wins, 2 draws, and 1 loss, maintaining a relatively high points - getting rate. They are adept at taking the initiative based on the home - field rhythm. Meanwhile, their defense has gradually stabilized, and they no longer concede goals in a haphazard way. The team's playing style is flexible. They can either apply high - pressing to break through the opponent's defense or retreat and launch quick counter - attacks

O/U
IRE PR Waterford United 1-1 St. Patricks Athletic

More Recommend

In this match, Geoje Citizen's offensive efficiency is significantly superior. Their offensive conversion rate reaches 18.2% (the league average is 12%), and the expected goals efficiency is 1.32, higher than that of Fuchuan FC's 0.91. The success rate of key passes is 79% compared to Fuchuan FC's 65%. The value index of front - field passes is 8.4, while Fuchuan FC only has 6.1. Geoje Citizen also has a strong control in the midfield. The average time for each counter - attack is 4.2 seconds, which effectively compresses the space of Fuchuan FC's formation. In terms of physical performance, the total running distance of Geoje Citizen's players is 116.7 km, and they have 142 high - intensity sprints, both leading the visiting team. I invite you to follow me and join the core group to get more in - depth analysis！ In the K League, the performance of Gwangju Sangmu has been quite remarkable. Their defensive stats are incredibly impressive. With an average of 24 tackles, 17 interception

AH
KOR D1 Gimcheon Sangmu FC - Bucheon FC 1995
Lillestrøm holds an edge over Fredrikstad in several key aspects. In terms of offensive conversion rate, Lillestrøm's 18% outperforms Fredrikstad's 12%. The expected goals per game efficiency of Lillestrøm is 0.34 higher. Regarding key pass success rate, the away team (Lillestrøm) has a 72% success rate compared to the home team's 65%. Lillestrøm also creates 0.7 more threatening passes per 90 minutes in the attacking third. In midfield control, Lillestrøm controls 55% of the play. They have 3 more counter - attacks per game on average, and their fast - break success rate is 12% higher. In terms of physical performance, Lillestrøm runs 2.1 kilometers more than Fredrikstad. They also have 15 more high - intensity sprints, covering a wider area on the pitch. Overall, Lillestrøm shows better offensive, midfield, and physical capabilities in this comparison, which could potentially influence the outcome of the match. Lillestrøm shows a clear edge in this encounter based on various

AH
NOR D1 Fredrikstad - Lillestrom
In recent matches, the offensive performance of Chengdu Rongcheng has been more efficient than that of Chongqing Tongliang Long. In terms of offensive conversion, Chengdu Rongcheng's offensive end has a conversion rate of 18.7% in the last five games, significantly higher than Chongqing Tongliang Long's 11.2%. The xG efficiency value stands at 1.32 for Chengdu Rongcheng compared to 0.89 for their opponents, indicating that Chengdu Rongcheng creates more high - quality goal - scoring opportunities. When it comes to passing, the key passing success rate of Chengdu Rongcheng is 74.3%, while Chongqing Tongliang Long only has 62.1%. The passing value index in the front - court is 31% higher for Chengdu Rongcheng. This means they can maintain a more fluid ball - control rhythm. In midfield, the ball - conduction speed of Chengdu Rongcheng is 5.2 times per minute, faster than Chongqing Tongliang Long's 4.1 times per minute, posing a greater threat in counter - attacks. In terms of physical pe

AH
CHA CSL Chengdu Rongcheng FC - Chongqing Tonglianglong

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Waterford United VS St. Patricks Athletic