Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
The Touchline | 𝐓
67
Articles
0
Like
0
Follower
66.7%
Win Rate
+20.2%
ROI
16
Tips
1.95
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
Boris MoscosoWon 15/17Follow88.2%Win Rate +54%ROI 18Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
2
🔥🐸 THE FOOL 🐸🔥Follow80%Win Rate +29%ROI 12Tips 1.86Avg Odds -
3
OC TIPSTERFollow79.2%Win Rate +39.9%ROI 28Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
4
Luis Antonio Lomeli BonillaFollow78.6%Win Rate +53.3%ROI 14Tips 1.95Avg Odds -
5
imaagination✨🐣Follow76.9%Win Rate +31.1%ROI 31Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
6
Games_ Under_OverFollow76.9%Win Rate +45.5%ROI 16Tips 1.92Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
LIMITLESS™ 🔥🤍KR Reykjavik shows a clear edge in offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.5%, while Keflavik's is only 12.3%. In terms of xG efficiency, KR's 0.92 outperforms Keflavik's 0.75. Passing analysis reveals that KR has a 78% success rate in key passes, compared to Keflavik's 65%. The value of KR's forward passes is +0.35, much higher than Keflavik's +0.15, indicating their precise organization. KR also controls the midfield with a 58% possession rate. Their transition speed is 2.1 seconds, enabling efficient counter - attacks. In terms of physical fitness, KR has a significant advantage. They have run 118 km and made 350 high - intensity sprints, while Keflavik has run 112 km and made 280 high - intensity sprints. This physical superiority supports KR's high - pressure system. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming KR Reykjavik has shown a solid defensive performance. They've made 22 tackles (18 successful), 15 interceptO/U
ICE PR
Keflavik
3-2 KR Reykjavik
-
saidramadhanKR Reykjavik shows a clear edge in various aspects compared to Keflavik. In terms of offensive efficiency, Keflavik has an average offensive conversion rate of only 12.3% this season, lower than KR Reykjavik's 18.7%. The xG efficiency comparison stands at 1.2 vs 1.9, indicating that the away team has better offensive quality. Regarding passing, KR's key - pass success rate reaches 84.5%, and its front - field passing value index is 92.3, far exceeding Keflavik's 76.8% and 81.5% respectively. In midfield control, KR leads the league with a 62.4% control rate. They also have a 35.1% share of fast - transition attacks, while Keflavik relies more on positional play. In terms of physical condition, KR Reykjavik runs an average of 112.6 km per game and has 19.3 high - intensity sprints, showing a significant advantage in physical reserves. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming KR Reykjavik has been in excellent form on the offensive end, with an aO/UICE PR
Keflavik
3-2 KR Reykjavik
-
Jogo BonitoKR Reykjavik shows a clear edge in various aspects compared to Keflavik. In terms of offensive efficiency, Keflavik has an average offensive conversion rate of only 12.3% this season, significantly lower than KR Reykjavik's 18.7%. The xG efficiency comparison stands at 1.2 for Keflavik and 1.9 for KR, indicating that the away team has a better offensive quality. KR Reykjavik also excels in passing. Their key pass success rate reaches 84.5%, and the front - field passing value index is 92.3, far exceeding Keflavik's 76.8% and 81.5% respectively. In midfield control, KR Reykjavik leads the league with a 62.4% control rate. They rely on a high - proportion of fast - transition attacks, which account for 35.1%, while Keflavik depends more on positional play. When it comes to physical fitness, KR Reykjavik runs an average of 112.6 km per game and has 19.3 high - intensity sprints, showing a clear advantage in physical reserves. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free liveO/UICE PR
Keflavik
3-2 KR Reykjavik
ICE PR
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post