Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Boris MoscosoWon 15/17Follow88.2%Win Rate +54%ROI 18Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
2
🔥🐸 THE FOOL 🐸🔥Follow80%Win Rate +29%ROI 12Tips 1.86Avg Odds -
3
OC TIPSTERFollow79.2%Win Rate +39.9%ROI 28Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
4
Luis Antonio Lomeli BonillaFollow78.6%Win Rate +53.3%ROI 14Tips 1.95Avg Odds -
5
imaagination✨🐣Follow76.9%Win Rate +31.1%ROI 31Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
6
Games_ Under_OverFollow76.9%Win Rate +45.5%ROI 16Tips 1.92Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Olavi VaisanenKR Reykjavik shows a significant edge in offensive performance when compared to Keflavik. Keflavik's recent offensive conversion rate stands at a mere 9.8%, which is notably lower than the league average of 12.4%. In contrast, KR Reykjavik boasts an impressive 14.3% conversion rate. The gap becomes even more pronounced when looking at the xG efficiency. The away team, KR Reykjavik, creates 0.83 xG per 90 minutes, while Keflavik manages only 0.51 xG. This superiority in offensive quality is further reflected in the key pass success rate, where KR Reykjavik has a 62% success rate compared to Keflavik's 48%. Additionally, the value of forward passes also favors the away team, with KR Reykjavik at 0.75 and Keflavik at 0.52. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streamingAH
ICE PR
Keflavik
3-2 KR Reykjavik
-
LIMITLESS™ 🔥🤍KR Reykjavik shows a clear edge in offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.5%, while Keflavik's is only 12.3%. In terms of xG efficiency, KR's 0.92 outperforms Keflavik's 0.75. Passing analysis reveals that KR has a 78% success rate in key passes, compared to Keflavik's 65%. The value of KR's forward passes is +0.35, much higher than Keflavik's +0.15, indicating their precise organization. KR also controls the midfield with a 58% possession rate. Their transition speed is 2.1 seconds, enabling efficient counter - attacks. In terms of physical fitness, KR has a significant advantage. They have run 118 km and made 350 high - intensity sprints, while Keflavik has run 112 km and made 280 high - intensity sprints. This physical superiority supports KR's high - pressure system. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming KR Reykjavik has shown a solid defensive performance. They've made 22 tackles (18 successful), 15 interceptO/UICE PR
Keflavik
3-2 KR Reykjavik
-
Jogo BonitoKR Reykjavik shows a clear edge in various aspects compared to Keflavik. In terms of offensive efficiency, Keflavik has an average offensive conversion rate of only 12.3% this season, significantly lower than KR Reykjavik's 18.7%. The xG efficiency comparison stands at 1.2 for Keflavik and 1.9 for KR, indicating that the away team has a better offensive quality. KR Reykjavik also excels in passing. Their key pass success rate reaches 84.5%, and the front - field passing value index is 92.3, far exceeding Keflavik's 76.8% and 81.5% respectively. In midfield control, KR Reykjavik leads the league with a 62.4% control rate. They rely on a high - proportion of fast - transition attacks, which account for 35.1%, while Keflavik depends more on positional play. When it comes to physical fitness, KR Reykjavik runs an average of 112.6 km per game and has 19.3 high - intensity sprints, showing a clear advantage in physical reserves. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free liveO/UICE PR
Keflavik
3-2 KR Reykjavik
ICE PR
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post