Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Okiem Madridisty>

    Beijing Guoan VS Wuhan Three Towns

    Chinese Super League
    Analysis More Tips
    Beijing Guoan
    Beijing Guoan 1
    0 Wuhan Three Towns
    Wuhan Three Towns
    Further Reading
    • VIP100%
      VIP100%
      Beijing Guoan has had a mixed record this season. After 15 rounds, they've secured 5 wins, 5 draws, and 5 losses, amassing 15 points (10 points after a 5 - point deduction). They've scored 26 goals and conceded 23, with a goal difference of +3, currently sitting in 10th place. The first half of the season saw a split in their performance. They led the league in ball - possession rate at 61.4% and ranked second with 217 shots in 15 rounds. However, their conversion rate of 11.9% was the lowest, meaning they could create opportunities but often missed chances. During the break, coach Montgomery focused on improving the combination between the flanks and the center, which could lead to a better offensive efficiency. This is the first game of the second half of the season, and with Suarez's return against his former club, the team's motivation is high. Wuhan Sanzhen has a more challenging situation. After 15 rounds, they have 2 wins, 7 draws, and 6 losses, getting 13 points (8 after a 5 -
      O/U
      CHA CSL Beijing Guoan 1-0 Wuhan Three Towns
    • STARFACE SAJO
      STARFACE SAJO
      Beijing Guoan has won 5, drawn 3, and lost 2 in their last 10 matches, but their defensive efficiency is not ideal. On the other hand, Wuhan Sanzhen has won 1, drawn 7, and lost 2 in the same period. The team's recent form has been quite impressive, and the key to this significant improvement lies in the outstanding performance of their defense. Although Wuhan Sanzhen's home record is good with few losses, their lineup is still incomplete. Despite having an edge in terms of overall strength and recent form, and being highly motivated to avoid defeat, there are still risks. The forwards of Wuhan Sanzhen are underperforming, which could pose a threat. The gap between the two teams is not huge, and there are differences in their performances. It's hard to predict which team will emerge victorious in this exciting encounter. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Beijing Guoan has shown an improved form recently, with 5 wins, 3 draws, and 2 losse
      O/U
      CHA CSL Beijing Guoan 1-0 Wuhan Three Towns
    • BET ENSURED
      BET ENSURED Won 4/5
      Beijing Guoan Stats In the last games, Beijing Guoan has shown diverse performance statistics. They have a win rate of 50%, while their draw rate stands at 30%. On the other hand, they lost 20% of the games. Interesting aspects include a 40% rate of winning with over 1.5 goals scored and a 20% rate of losing while conceding over 1.5 goals. On average, Beijing Guoan scores 2 goals per game and concedes 2 goals per game. Their clean sheet rate is 20% of the games, and the team scored in 100% of the games. Goals were scored in both halves in 40% of the games, and both teams scored (BTTS) in 80% of the matches. The combination of winning and BTTS occurred in 30% of the games, while a draw with BTTS was seen in 30%, and losing with BTTS in 20%. The match total goals were 0 goals in 0% of the games, 1 goal in 10% of the games, 2 goals in 10% of the games, 3 goals in 30% of the games, and 4 or more goals in 50% of the games. Wuhan Three Towns Stats In their recent games, Wuhan Three Towns has
      AH
      CHA CSL Beijing Guoan 1-0 Wuhan Three Towns
    More Recommend
    • VPS Vaasa has been in strong form on the offensive end recently. In their last five matches, their average offensive conversion rate stands at 18%, while Gnistan's is 15%. The xG efficiency of VPS Vaasa is 1.92 per game, leading Gnistan's 1.65 per game. In terms of key passes, VPS Vaasa's success rate is 72%, compared to Gnistan's 65%. The value of their forward passes is 0.45 per pass, higher than Gnistan's 0.38 per pass. In midfield control, VPS Vaasa has an average ball - possession rate of 58%, suppressing Gnistan's 42%. The average time for their counter - attacks is 12 seconds, faster than Gnistan's 15 seconds. Regarding running data, the whole VPS team runs an average of 112 km per game, while Gnistan runs 105 km. VPS also has 220 high - intensity sprints, significantly better than Gnistan's 190. I believe that only by making careful recommendations can we achieve long - term development. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming VPS Vaas
      O/U
      FIN D1 Gnistan Helsinki - Vaasa VPS
    • Oulu has been showing some distinct characteristics in their recent performances. While their offensive conversion rate stands at 12.8%, which is lower than Lahti's 15.3%, their xG efficiency of 1.15 surpasses Lahti's 0.98, indicating a higher - quality attack. In terms of passing, Oulu has a remarkable edge. Their key pass success rate is 76%, significantly better than Lahti's 68%. Moreover, the value of their forward - field passes is evident, with 2.4 chances created compared to Lahti's 1.8. When it comes to midfield control, Oulu dominates. They have an average ball - possession rate of 54%, accompanied by 17 offensive transitions per game. Their running distance of 112 km outstrips Lahti's 108 km, and with 43 high - intensity sprints compared to Lahti's 38, they seem more energetic on the pitch. I believe that by offering in - depth analysis, I can provide long - term value. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Oulu has a strong defens
      O/U
      FIN D1 AC Oulu - Lahti
    • Sligo Rovers have been in fine form recently, boasting a higher offensive conversion rate compared to Shelbourne. In their last five games, Sligo Rovers' average offensive conversion rate reached 18.7%, while Shelbourne's was only 14.2%. In terms of the xG efficiency on the offensive end, Sligo Rovers' 1.83 is superior to Shelbourne's 1.52. Their key pass success rate stands at 72%, leading Shelbourne's 65%. The difference in the front - field passing value coefficient, 0.68 for Sligo Rovers and 0.59 for Shelbourne, reflects a more efficient offensive organization. When it comes to midfield control, Sligo Rovers regain the ball 43 times per game on average and initiate counter - attacks 11.3 times per game, better than Shelbourne's 37 and 9.1 times respectively. Their high - intensity running distance is 118km compared to Shelbourne's 112km, and the sprint count of 27:21 shows that Sligo Rovers have a stronger physical reserve. I believe that by providing careful and well - considered
      O/U
      IRE PR Sligo Rovers - Shelbourne
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.