Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Okiem Madridisty>

    Henan Football Club VS Shanghai Port

    Chinese Super League
    Analysis More Tips
    Henan Football Club
    Henan Football Club 1
    2 Shanghai Port
    Shanghai Port
    Further Reading
    • Every Movie Plug
      Every Movie Plug Won 5/6
      In their 15 matches, Henan Team has scored 23 goals and conceded 21. They hold a 56% ball possession rate, with 149 shots, 57 of which were on target. The on - target rate stands at 38%, and the goal - scoring rate is 40%. Shanghai Haigang also has 23 goals scored and 21 conceded in 15 games. They share the same 56% ball possession rate, 149 shots, 57 on - target, a 38% on - target rate, and a 40% goal - scoring rate. However, Haigang's offensive efficiency is higher than Henan's. Yet, their defensive issues are quite prominent. With an average of 1.4 goals conceded per game, their defensive quality is in the lower - middle level of the league. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming
      AH
      CHA CSL Henan Football Club 1-2 Shanghai Port
    • ijuyun
      ijuyun
      The historical head - to - head data between Henan Team and Shanghai Haigang in the Chinese Super League reveals the tactical value of corner - kick control. Looking back at Shanghai Haigang's last five away games against Henan Team, Shanghai Haigang has maintained a dominant position in corner - kick statistics. In all five games, the away team (Shanghai Haigang) had more corner kicks than the home team (Henan Team), with a total corner - kick difference of 19, an average of 3.8 more per game. In one game, Shanghai Haigang lost 1 - 2 away, but still had a corner - kick difference of - 6 (6 more than Henan Team). In another, they won 4 - 1 away with a corner - kick difference of - 4. There was also a 0 - 1 loss with a corner - kick difference of - 1, a 3 - 1 win with a corner - kick difference of - 5, and a 3 - 1 defeat where the corner - kick difference was - 3. These figures clearly show that Shanghai Haigang has a strong ability to dominate corner kicks on the road. They hold an adv
      AH
      CHA CSL Henan Football Club 1-2 Shanghai Port
    • Red_Guy
      Red_Guy
      The Henan team, a mid - table force, has been on a strong rebound after a tough start to the season. With the home - field advantage, they have a tactical edge with former players of the opposing team in their ranks. Their game plan is centered around a solid defensive - counterattack strategy. On the other hand, Shanghai Haigang, the defending champion of last season, has been struggling this year due to numerous injuries. Their performance has significantly declined, and they are in desperate need of points away from home to reverse their slump. They still carry the grudge of their last home - game loss. The two teams are closely matched, with only a 3 - point gap between them in the league standings. A single win can completely change the mid - season rankings. It will be a battle between Henan's tenacious defensive - counterattack and Shanghai Haigang's possession - based attacking style. There will be confrontations between former players, a competition affected by injuries, and a
      O/U
      CHA CSL Henan Football Club 1-2 Shanghai Port
    More Recommend
    • VPS Vaasa has been in strong form on the offensive end recently. In their last five matches, their average offensive conversion rate stands at 18%, while Gnistan's is 15%. The xG efficiency of VPS Vaasa is 1.92 per game, leading Gnistan's 1.65 per game. In terms of key passes, VPS Vaasa's success rate is 72%, compared to Gnistan's 65%. The value of their forward passes is 0.45 per pass, higher than Gnistan's 0.38 per pass. In midfield control, VPS Vaasa has an average ball - possession rate of 58%, suppressing Gnistan's 42%. The average time for their counter - attacks is 12 seconds, faster than Gnistan's 15 seconds. Regarding running data, the whole VPS team runs an average of 112 km per game, while Gnistan runs 105 km. VPS also has 220 high - intensity sprints, significantly better than Gnistan's 190. I believe that only by making careful recommendations can we achieve long - term development. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming VPS Vaas
      O/U
      FIN D1 Gnistan Helsinki - Vaasa VPS
    • Oulu has been showing some distinct characteristics in their recent performances. While their offensive conversion rate stands at 12.8%, which is lower than Lahti's 15.3%, their xG efficiency of 1.15 surpasses Lahti's 0.98, indicating a higher - quality attack. In terms of passing, Oulu has a remarkable edge. Their key pass success rate is 76%, significantly better than Lahti's 68%. Moreover, the value of their forward - field passes is evident, with 2.4 chances created compared to Lahti's 1.8. When it comes to midfield control, Oulu dominates. They have an average ball - possession rate of 54%, accompanied by 17 offensive transitions per game. Their running distance of 112 km outstrips Lahti's 108 km, and with 43 high - intensity sprints compared to Lahti's 38, they seem more energetic on the pitch. I believe that by offering in - depth analysis, I can provide long - term value. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Oulu has a strong defens
      O/U
      FIN D1 AC Oulu - Lahti
    • Sligo Rovers have been in fine form recently, boasting a higher offensive conversion rate compared to Shelbourne. In their last five games, Sligo Rovers' average offensive conversion rate reached 18.7%, while Shelbourne's was only 14.2%. In terms of the xG efficiency on the offensive end, Sligo Rovers' 1.83 is superior to Shelbourne's 1.52. Their key pass success rate stands at 72%, leading Shelbourne's 65%. The difference in the front - field passing value coefficient, 0.68 for Sligo Rovers and 0.59 for Shelbourne, reflects a more efficient offensive organization. When it comes to midfield control, Sligo Rovers regain the ball 43 times per game on average and initiate counter - attacks 11.3 times per game, better than Shelbourne's 37 and 9.1 times respectively. Their high - intensity running distance is 118km compared to Shelbourne's 112km, and the sprint count of 27:21 shows that Sligo Rovers have a stronger physical reserve. I believe that by providing careful and well - considered
      O/U
      IRE PR Sligo Rovers - Shelbourne
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.