Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Boris MoscosoWon 12/13Follow87.5%Win Rate +52.5%ROI 17Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
2
FurkanHolseWon 10/11Follow84%Win Rate +58.7%ROI 29Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
3
MTASHEWon 15/15Follow80%Win Rate +40.7%ROI 33Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
4
Mbah_tipsterFollow76.9%Win Rate +36.4%ROI 13Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
4
JJ LauFollow76.9%Win Rate +26.7%ROI 13Tips 1.72Avg Odds -
6
De prince 🤴Follow75%Win Rate +47.5%ROI 10Tips 1.95Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Pi314In this match, the offensive performance of the two teams shows significant differences. Easton Shabe has an offensive conversion rate of 18.2% in the last five games, which is lower than Brisbane Olympic's 24.5%. The xG efficiency value of Easton Shabe is 0.79, while that of Brisbane is 1.13, indicating that the away team has a clear advantage in offensive quality. In terms of key passing, Brisbane's success rate reaches 61.3%, 9 percentage points higher than the home team. The value of forward passes is 0.82 threatening passes per 90 minutes for the away team, while the home team only has 0.57 times. The midfield control data also favors the away team. Brisbane has a ball - possession rate of 54.7%, suppressing the home team. The conversion speed is 2.3 seconds per time, 0.4 seconds faster than the home team. In terms of physical performance, Brisbane's average running distance is 112.3 km, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 147 times. Both data are more than 12% higher thAH
AUS QSL
Eastern Suburbs Brisbane
1-2 Brisbane Olympic United FC
AUS QSL
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post