Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Richard WhiteheadFollow87.5%Win Rate +57.8%ROI 11Tips 1.95Avg Odds -
2
Garis TengahWon 9/9Follow84.6%Win Rate +30.3%ROI 14Tips 1.80Avg Odds -
3
AbuleWon 4/4Follow81.8%Win Rate +21.7%ROI 11Tips 1.47Avg Odds -
4
Mbah_tipsterFollow80%Win Rate +45.9%ROI 20Tips 1.84Avg Odds -
5
udadheWon 11/14Follow77.8%Win Rate +48.4%ROI 18Tips 2.02Avg Odds -
6
Jogo BonitoFollow76.5%Win Rate +38.4%ROI 22Tips 1.92Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
NajibbbbbxcCharleston Battery VS Loudoun United Charles Charleston Battery has been in good offensive form recently. In their last five matches, their offensive conversion rate stands at 28%, ranking third in the league. Their xG efficiency reaches 1.15, higher than the average of 1.02. The success rate of key passes is 47%, and the average value of forward passes is 2.3 times per 90 minutes. On the other hand, Loudoun United also has its own offensive characteristics. Although their offensive conversion rate is 22%, their xG efficiency is 1.08. The success rate of key passes is 41%, and the value of forward passes is 1.8 times per 90 minutes. In terms of midfield control, Charleston Battery has a 58% ball - possession rate and 412 passes. However, Loudoun United has a faster transition speed, completing counter - attacks in an average of 12 seconds. They also cover a running distance of 112 km and have 68 high - intensity sprints. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live fO/U
USL CH
Charleston Battery
3-0
Loudoun United
-
Yossi MedinaCharleston Battery VS Loudoun United Charleston Battery has a significant edge with their home - field advantage. They possess a well - balanced offense and defense system. Their gameplay style is centered around maintaining ball control, which allows them to create numerous shooting opportunities. Historically, they've held a clear upper hand in their match - ups against Loudoun United. On the other hand, Loudoun United features a flexible attacking rhythm. Their forwards are constantly making runs and interceptions in the front - field. However, when playing away from home, their defensive coordination often falls short, making it easy for opponents to break through their side - line defense. Under the USL Championship's format, teams often make strategic decisions regarding lineup rotations. The two teams have different attacking rhythms. Charleston Battery focuses on positional ball - passing, while Loudoun United relies on quick counter - attacks. In this game, the efficiency of bAHUSL CH
Charleston Battery
3-0
Loudoun United
-
Trevor MuseCharleston Battery VS Loudoun United Charleson Battery has shown a stronger offensive performance this season. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 12.8%, higher than Loudoun United's 9.1%. In terms of xG efficiency, Charleson Battery records 0.87/xG, better than their opponent's 0.73/xG. When it comes to key passing success rate, Charleson Battery reaches 68%, 12 percentage points higher than Loudoun United. They also lead in terms of the value of forward passes, with 2.3 times per 90 minutes, 1.1 times more than their rival. In midfield control, Charleson Battery has an edge. They have a 54% ball - possession rate in the midfield area and a faster transition speed, completing counter - attacks in an average of 8 seconds. Their total running distance in the whole game is 109km, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 126 times, both more than 10% higher than Loudoun United. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Charleson BatteryO/UUSL CH
Charleston Battery
3-0
Loudoun United
USL CH
More Recommend
-
South Africa VS South Korea South Africa's performance in the World Cup has shown a significant imbalance in offense and defense. Statistics indicate that the team has a win rate of only 20%, a draw rate of 40%, and a loss rate of 40% as well. The goal difference stands at 10:13, with a negative goal difference of -3 and an average of only 1 goal per game. The defensive issues are particularly prominent. An average of 1.3 goals conceded per game proves the fragility of the defense, and an average of 1.9 yellow cards per game reveals the aggressive nature of their defensive actions. In the battle for corner - kicks, South Africa's average of 3.5 corner - kicks per game is in stark contrast to South Korea's 5.3, suggesting that South Africa's threat on the flanks is limited. As a result, the defensive pressure may be concentrated in the middle area. Notably, South Africa has drawn in more than half of its games, which reflects the team's lack of offensive efficiency and consistency in taAH
World Cup
South Africa
-
South Korea
World Cup
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post