Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Stef Olivier K
211
Articles
0
Like
0
Follower
45.7%
Win Rate
-16.4%
ROI
38
Tips
1.89
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
Richard WhiteheadFollow87.5%Win Rate +57.8%ROI 11Tips 1.95Avg Odds -
2
Garis TengahWon 9/9Follow84.6%Win Rate +30.3%ROI 14Tips 1.80Avg Odds -
3
AbuleWon 4/4Follow81.8%Win Rate +21.7%ROI 11Tips 1.47Avg Odds -
4
Mbah_tipsterFollow80%Win Rate +45.9%ROI 20Tips 1.84Avg Odds -
5
udadheWon 11/14Follow77.8%Win Rate +48.4%ROI 18Tips 2.02Avg Odds -
6
Jogo BonitoFollow76.5%Win Rate +38.4%ROI 22Tips 1.92Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Sfiso_93Charleston Battery VS Loudoun United Charles Charleston Battery has been in good offensive form recently. In their last five games, their offensive conversion rate stands at 28%, ranking third in the league. Their xG efficiency reaches 1.15, higher than the league average of 1.02. They also have a 47% key - pass success rate, with an average of 2.3 valuable forward passes per 90 minutes. On the other hand, Loudoun United, although having an offensive conversion rate of 22%, shows decent performance. Their xG efficiency is 1.08, with a 41% key - pass success rate and 1.8 valuable forward passes per 90 minutes. In terms of midfield control, Charleston Battery has a 58% ball - possession rate and 412 passes. However, Loudoun United is quicker in transitions, completing counter - attacks in an average of 12 seconds. They also cover a running distance of 112 km and have 68 high - intensity sprints. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming CharlesonO/U
USL CH
Charleston Battery
3-0
Loudoun United
-
Trevor MuseCharleston Battery VS Loudoun United Charleson Battery has shown a stronger offensive performance this season. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 12.8%, higher than Loudoun United's 9.1%. In terms of xG efficiency, Charleson Battery records 0.87/xG, better than their opponent's 0.73/xG. When it comes to key passing success rate, Charleson Battery reaches 68%, 12 percentage points higher than Loudoun United. They also lead in terms of the value of forward passes, with 2.3 times per 90 minutes, 1.1 times more than their rival. In midfield control, Charleson Battery has an edge. They have a 54% ball - possession rate in the midfield area and a faster transition speed, completing counter - attacks in an average of 8 seconds. Their total running distance in the whole game is 109km, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 126 times, both more than 10% higher than Loudoun United. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Charleson BatteryO/UUSL CH
Charleston Battery
3-0
Loudoun United
-
Marc MscCharleston Battery VS Loudoun United Charleson Battery has shown a stronger offensive performance this season. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 12.8%, higher than Loudoun United's 9.1%. In terms of xG efficiency, Charleson Battery is at 0.87/xG, outperforming Loudoun United's 0.73/xG. When it comes to key pass success rate, Charleson Battery reaches 68%, 12 percentage points higher than their opponents. Their forward pass value is 2.3 times per 90 minutes, leading by 1.1 times. Regarding midfield control, Charleson Battery holds a 54% ball - possession rate in the midfield area and has an average counter - attack conversion speed of 8 seconds, both of which are advantages. Moreover, their total running distance of 109 km and 126 high - intensity sprints are over 10% more than those of Loudoun United. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Charleson Battery holds a clear edge in offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate ofO/UUSL CH
Charleston Battery
3-0
Loudoun United
USL CH
More Recommend
-
South Africa VS South Korea South Africa's performance in terms of offense and defense has been significantly imbalanced in the World Cup. Statistics show that the team has a win - rate of only 20%, a draw rate of 40%, and a loss rate of 40% as well. The goal difference ratio stands at 10:13, with a negative goal difference of -3 and an average of just 1 goal per game. The defensive issues are particularly prominent. An average of 1.3 goals conceded per game indicates the frailty of the defensive line, and an average of 1.9 yellow cards per game reveals the aggressive nature of their defensive actions. In the corner - kick battle, South Africa has an average of 3.5 corner kicks, in sharp contrast to South Korea's 5.3. This implies that South Africa's threat on the flanks is limited, and the defensive pressure may be concentrated in the middle area. Notably, South Africa has drawn in more than half of its games, which reflects the team's lack of sufficient offensive efficiency and stabiAH
World Cup
South Africa
-
South Korea
World Cup
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post